
|
THIS COUNTRY'S BIGGEST "PONZI" AND YOU, AS CUSTOMERS ARE UNPROTECTED
In late January they gave me another support number to call saying I had a "red carpet" account, that way I could speak with management people, a week later they froze my account. This did not allow me to make any transactions but allowed people to make deposits into my account, which I requested be stopped until our problem was resolved. They refused to do this and took other peoples money to satisfy the negative balance in my account. I requested this by email and phone on February 5. My account became positive and they opened it. I started transferring gold into my customers accounts again trying to catch up and then they "locked" my account. As of today they have me +$20,000.00 out of pocket money and a negative balance of somewhere in the $9,000.00 range. Now they are e-mailing my customers saying they should file fraud charges against me. Also telling them that they have had many complaints against my account and basically that I'm the crook. My customers are behind me and now send me monies in other ways. IE.C2it,western union, money gram, cashiers check and bank wires. My point is Paypal is not what they say they are. As a supposed financial institution or so, the only thing they are concerned with is getting accounts which adds up to transaction fees regardless of whether they are legitimate or not. I now see that their policies are strictly set up to protect themselves not there legitimate customers. Their security is at best nonexistent. 1. I did not accept the accounts THEY DID 2. I did not have access to there bank accounts or credit cards. THEY DID 3. I kept my commitment to my customers THEY DIDN'T 4. I researched what accounts I could and proved them wrong THEY DIDN'T In conclusion I believe they are a young company with growing pains and I believe they should be responsible for their mistakes. If they do not wish to come to satisfactory terms then my only recourse will be to take legal action against them and vigorously inform those on the Internet as to my situation so this does not happen to them UPDATE: After many hours of telephone conversations with a Mr. Sandeep Lal, Paypal's representative, my ACCT now is $31,083.45 in arrears and my negative balance has grown to $12,922.63. Each time paypal sends monies back to a customer that sent me money after I asked that they block my account from accepting monies they raise the negative balance. Mr. Sandeep tells me that paypals board of directors would like to have me as a customer and would agree to let me payoff the negative $12,900.00 over a 6 month period. WOW THAT'S MIGHTY NICE OF THEM. They also tell me that as in the past I would be responsible for those accounts that wanted to claim a charge back anytime within a 3-6 month period, and as I was before charge backs from an account that received funds through 2-3 other accounts that were charged back. WHEW they have some system of accounting and here are some examples. In February I received these contacts from my customers They "PAYPAL" have consistently took other peoples money to payback supposedly "FRAUDULENT FUNDS" and then charged me for them when I told them I would file theft of funds charges against them. What I can't believe is that in this day and age of government regulations they are seemingly unregulated and can change their "terms of service" as they see fit to protect themselves, with total disregard to their customers. I guess I have no other choice at this time but to seek the help of my attorney generals office as well as my lawyer. In the mean time I will diligently use my time to try and notify my fellow Internet friends and their friends of the possibilities of doing business with this unregulated Internet entity. SEE Damien Cave's article FEB.23,2001 ( salon.com ) I ask you is this not slander at it worst---"While I doubt this person [Brody] is engaged with the Russian mafia, I don't think [he and other e-Gold merchants] are totally innocent either," Thiel says. "They certainly know that much of the money they're receiving is from suspicious sources." UPDATE -March 1 2002 Well folks we went to arbitration on the 21st and 22nd of January and the decision is due at the latest on the 4th of April. As I sit here today, I'm asking myself "WAS IT WORTH IT". Well yes and no. Yes, because most of my 60 yrs. I've believed that when you feel your in the right you fight for a principle, as most of you have. We don't know whether we won our case yet, but I do now know that principles come at a high price. The agony that Hanna and I have gone through in the past 14 months is priceless. We have over 95k in credit card debt,14k of which went to the American Arbitration Association, (in a court it would have cost less than 1k) over 4k traveling to San Francisco. Legal fees have exceeded 100k and I still owe my attorneys over 30k. A year and a half ago we were trying to prepare to retire. Thanks to paypal we now are looking at possibly losing our home as well as everything else we've worked for all or lives. Paypal has filed a protective order on the case, I guess they don't want you to be able to make a judgment for yourselves. Ignorance of their ways is power. If a court finds me in violation of this ridiculous order then so be it. At least I will go to jail knowing I have done my best to warn my fellow Americans of the possible pitfalls of doing business with them. I have come to the realization that terrorism does not just rest in the hands of ben laden, (he will kill you), but Peter, Max, Reid and the staff of paypal will make you feel like like a bomb has leveled you. By the way, when Peter Thiel was suppose to testify at my hearing he didn't have the intestinal fortitude (GUTS) to show up. One question remains, why would paypal spend over 350k of your money trying to get 18k out of me. Well the verdict is in. Paypal forced us into arbitration and we lost. Well we did get $5,000.00 taken of the $18,976.29 under the seller protection program, which means we only owe paypal $13,976.29 + $784.97 interest and $312,213.50 in attorney fees and $26,703.91 in paralegal fees. So much for a simple contract dispute and doing business with them. Update- Sept. 5, 2002 Just 5 days after a Federal Judge in
California ruled Paypal's user agreement and arbitration clause
"unconscionable" and 16 days short of 9 months, the arbitrator finally
decided to hand down his final award. Seems he was unable to award Paypal
their $338,917.41 in legal fees. So what he did was split his fee of
$23,973.84, 30% Paypal and 70% us. So actually we owe the arbitrator more than
we owe Paypal. (APP. $16,800) I guess he strung out the decision for 9 months
so he could run his fee up. |
Interested in reading more